Most people, if not everyone, recognize the benefits of exercise. An entire industry has been built around promoting proactive health, with both food and drug commercials emphasizing diet and exercise.
It seems, however, that the companies that promote exercise the most are the fitness clothing lines like Athleta, REI and Lululemon.
These companies have been great in showing us inclusiveness with diversity of body types, ethnicity, moms and kids, etc. But if you are over 60, evidently you don’t exercise… or at least that’s what the ads portray.
I have been a loyal Athleta buyer for over 30 years. I still wear their leggings and tops to my Pilates and Yoga classes. In my little town, those classes are densely populated by women over 60 and 70.
The women that I know in that age group row, hike, take fitness classes, ski, camp and bike. Why then, are we not part of the message that fitness benefits everyone, not just the young? Why are we not represented in this line of athletic wear?
The message that those companies communicate is that you don’t count if you are over 60. At that age, they assume, you can’t exercise. You can’t be fit. You are no longer a real athlete and therefore you don’t deserve to wear their stylish clothing.
Maybe don’t use that kind of harsh undertone in their commercial. And yet we all know that the attitude exists. It is featured prominently in ads that show young women climbing the hills with nary a 60- or 70-year-old in site.
I would like to ask all those fitness clothing companies that aren’t using models in their 60s and 70s – what are you afraid of?
Afraid your leggings won’t sell if you put them on an older woman with wrinkles and grey hair? Or perhaps you are afraid you’ll lose your sexy edge, because what’s sexy about getting older?
What if depicting mothers and their kids exercising could grow to include generational exercising? Now that would be sexy, and it would be a positive message: keep moving, regardless of your age.
The fitness fashion industry needs to ask themselves this question: What do you want for your mom and your grandma? Would you really prefer that they sit down in a chair and atrophy until they die?
Or would you like for them to live with as much vibrancy and joy of life as possible? Believe me when I say that upon hearing of your mother’s death, not one of you will say, “Geeze, if only she’d looked better in leggings.”
I am so proud to be a part of a consciously aging community where people exercise well into their 80s. I may be a little bit slower and a little less cut, but the same values of health and fitness that I held 30 years ago, are still true today.
And, I will vote with my pocket book whenever possible. I will keep looking for fitness clothing companies that aren’t afraid to promote physical activity to seniors. They’re the ones that will get my business and my accolades. As for the rest of them, no one puts granny in a corner!
How do you feel about an exercise industry that excludes our age group? Would you purchase leggings and other exercise clothing if the marketing and advertising was more inclusive of older women? Please share your thoughts below!
Your article tackles an important issue head-on. Ageism in the fitness clothing industry is a real concern. It’s inspiring to see you shed light on this and promote inclusivity. Every age deserves representation, and your insights encourage a more diverse, empowering, and inclusive approach to fitness fashion. Kudos!
So the question is how do we get their attention? How can this message be delivered to the clothing industry? Who wants my business?!
Yes, I believe more women over the age of 60 would appreciate exercise apparel and clothing in general to not exclude them. It is very difficult to find any apparel that does not cater to a younger woman’s body. It is difficult to understand why this is so, because there is a large population of woman over the age of 60 and our bodies do change over time.